Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Use Interpretation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Concord ZBA says no variance needed to convert office suite to residence at 8 Center Street
Summary
After debating a new staff interpretation of the zoning code, the Concord Zoning Board of Adjustment unanimously ruled that the applicant may continue converting a suite at 8 Center Street to a residence without a variance, finding the use consistent with the zoning table for the district.
Get email alerts on the Zoning Use Interpretation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Concord Zoning Board of Adjustment unanimously ruled that an applicant converting an office suite at 8 Center Street may proceed without a variance, ending a weeks-long uncertainty triggered by a change in staff interpretation.
Jeffrey Sandler, who appeared on behalf of property owner Concord Capital Properties, told the board the owners had invested money to convert one office suite into a residential unit and only later learned of a new planner interpretation that they said would require a variance. "What I've come before you to ask for is essentially to allow us to convert one of the units, which is currently an office into a residential unit," Sandler said.
The board spent much of its discussion parsing the zoning code’s table of principal uses and whether the conversion counts as a permitted conversion or as two principal uses on one lot that would require a variance. Several members read aloud the relevant provisions and contrasted the prior planner interpretation with the new one. Ultimately the chair framed the choice as a legal interpretation the board could make on its own.
A board member moved that, based on evidence presented, the use is permitted under the ordinance and no variance is required; another member seconded. The motion passed unanimously. The chair announced, "The Board has ruled that a variance is not required," clearing the way for the conversion to proceed.
The board did not address reimbursement of fees paid to pursue a variance; when asked, the chair said he could not advise on refunds. The ruling is limited to the zoning interpretation on this property and does not create a binding precedent beyond this case.
Next steps: The applicant may continue work consistent with the board’s ruling; any remaining building permits and plan approvals must proceed through the city’s permitting and inspection process.

