Supporters tell House panel cold‑water life‑jacket requirement would save lives; lawmakers debate dates and scope
Loading...
Summary
Witnesses backing S.326 told the House Transportation Committee that mandatory life‑jacket wear during cold months would reduce drowning risk; the panel debated whether the Nov.1–May1 window should be extended and sought clarity on 'open deck' language and enforcement responsibilities.
The Vermont House Transportation Committee heard extensive testimony April 9 on S.326, a bill that would require persons aboard vessels during cold‑water months to wear US Coast Guard‑approved wearable personal flotation devices when the vessel is underway and individuals are on open deck.
"It is simple. It is effective, and it saves lives," Jess Lucas, director of aquatics at the Greater Burlington YMCA and a member of the Water Safety Action Committee, told lawmakers. Lucas urged the panel to adopt the cold‑water life‑jacket requirement, saying Vermont's thousands of miles of rivers and hundreds of thousands of acres of lakes and wetlands make the state particularly vulnerable to cold‑water drowning incidents.
Al Johnson, Vermont's boating law administrator (Department of Public Safety, Marine Division), presented data and enforcement context. Johnson said Coast Guard and state data indicate roughly 75–80 percent of drowning victims were not wearing life jackets and that mandatory wear laws targeted to cold months have reduced fatalities in other states. He described the federal Recreational Boating Safety grant program that supports state patrols and public education (the state receives roughly $1,000,000 in federal RBS funds with a matching state contribution) and emphasized that the measure's primary effect would be on behavior via education and visible wear rather than broad criminal enforcement.
Committee members focused on technical drafting questions. Several lawmakers favored shifting the date window later — for example to June 1 rather than May 1 — to better match Vermont water temperatures and patrol schedules; others noted many neighboring states use Oct.1–May1 or similar ranges. Members also asked whether the bill's "open deck" wording would leave kayaks, tandem kayaks and certain small craft ambiguously covered; Al Johnson said the current draft could be read as a gray area and suggested broader language applying to vessels without an enclosed cabin might be simpler and safer.
On enforcement, witnesses said game wardens and state marine patrols would perform compliance checks when present, but staffing is limited in early spring and late fall, so the bill emphasizes outreach: state parks, social media, and coordinated messaging through the Water Safety Action Committee. Lucas said the committee will pursue education campaigns alongside potential law changes.
The committee did not vote. Members asked staff to compile comparative dates used by surrounding states, to clarify the "open deck" definition, and to return with options for enforcement language and outreach plans.
