Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Works topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council moves AFSCME DPW tentative agreement to warrant; town staff say changes aim to retain operators

Merrimack Town Council · February 10, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The council voted unanimously to move a three-year tentative agreement with AFSCME covering DPW workers to the warrant. The deal adds an equipment-operator I/II lane, a 10-step pay progression, comp-time options and certification incentives; some wastewater costs are expected to come from user fees.

The Merrimack Town Council voted unanimously to place a three-year tentative collective bargaining agreement with AFSCME (DPW workers) on the warrant for voter consideration.

Paul presented the agreement, which covers wastewater, highway, solid-waste and equipment maintenance employees. Key elements include creation of equipment-operator I/II lanes to provide a clearer career path, expansion to a 10-step salary progression to allow more frequent step increases, comp time up to 30 hours per year in lieu of overtime, and incentives for job-related certifications such as road-scholar training for highway staff. The contract adds a town Flexible Spending Account option and increases the safety-glasses allowance to $125 every other year to address prescription needs.

Paul said the town worked to reduce overtime costs by encouraging operators to volunteer for on-call duty rather than relying on supervisors; he also described a restructuring of steps and raises (a step drop in year one with an immediate 3 percent adjustment and a 2.5 percent step progression thereafter). He presented the contract cost impacts to the council as approximately $360,250 in year one, about $114,092 in year two, and roughly $111,005 in year three as spoken at the meeting.

A councilor asked whether wastewater-related costs came from user fees; Paul said roughly $130,000 of the year-one cost would come from wastewater user fees. The council moved the tentative agreement to the warrant by unanimous vote (6-0-0).

What happens next: the contract language and costs will be read at the public hearing and then presented at deliberative session for voters to decide.