Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Food Security topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Adelanto council debates community garden plan; agrees on phased approach and grant pursuit
Summary
Council members and residents debated a proposal to create a community garden that could include both hands‑on raised beds and a Freight Farms vertical hydroponic container. Due to cost concerns (staff cited an approximate $250,000 full program), the council declined immediate allocation of AES discretionary funds and directed staff to pursue grants, identify nonprofit partners and return with a phased plan and Earth Day near‑term actions.
Get email alerts on the Food Security topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A proposal for a community garden — combining traditional raised beds with a vertical hydroponic container system from Freight Farms — drew extensive public comment and a lengthy council discussion on Feb. 12.
Councilmember Stevana (community organizer) and others described plans to engage local nonprofits and residents to operate a site that would supply fresh produce to food pantries and provide workforce and education opportunities. Mayor Pro Tem Ramos and other council members emphasized the potential educational and resilience benefits of a hydroponic container, but also acknowledged the upfront and multi‑year operating costs staff and proponents presented.
Councilmember Evans and residents pressed for accessible, hands‑on options: many callers said they expected a traditional community garden where neighbors could “get their hands dirty,” and some urged the city to start smaller—plant fruit trees or raised beds near City Hall or the Glassner/Glasser Center and pursue grant funding for technology pilots.
City Manager Flores and staff explained AES‑negotiated funds ($2.5 million) were largely earmarked for roadway and infrastructure projects; staff said El Mirage road work and a traffic signal would cost several million dollars and therefore recommended caution about dedicating those funds to a large garden technology purchase.
Council discussion and direction: members agreed not to commit AES discretionary funds to the full container‑scale project at this time. Instead the council asked staff and council leads to:
• Identify and nominate a lead nonprofit partner to apply for grants and anchor the project;
• Seek available state and federal grants highlighted by Freight Farms and others (competitive grants in ranges up to ~$400,000 were discussed);
• Produce cost estimates for a smaller near‑term phase (for Earth Day) such as planting fruit trees and preparing modest raised beds or rehabbing the Glasser Center yard; and
• Return to the council with grant application plans, site options and five‑year operating-cost estimates if the container pilot remains under consideration.
Residents who supported the project emphasized long‑term food security and youth education; others urged the city to prioritize immediate public‑safety and infrastructure needs and to begin with a low‑cost, hands‑on pilot. Council members agreed to pursue a hybrid approach and to return to the council with concrete funding and site proposals.
What happens next: staff will research grant eligibility (city or nonprofit applicant options), identify partner nonprofits, produce modest near‑term steps for Earth Day (tree planting/raised beds) and return with detailed cost and operating plans before any major city funding commitment.
