Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Policy Student Discipline topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board narrows drug-testing penalties for student-athletes, refers policy for redraft
Summary
Trustee debate led the board to remove lifetime-ineligibility language for student-athletes who tested positive and to change penalties to apply for the remainder of the school year; the board also directed the policy to the policy subcommittee for comprehensive redrafting and clearer testing protocols.
Trustees debated Administrative Regulation 51 31.61 (random drug testing for student-athletes) and voted to revise two punitive provisions and send the policy to the board policy subcommittee for a thorough redraft.
Trustee Tillman argued the policy's language that a student who tests positive three times "is ineligible for athletics for the rest of his or her high school career" undermines the policy's stated intent as an incentive and recommended removing the lifetime-ineligibility wording.
Multiple trustees raised concerns about fairness of random selection, documentation of what substances are tested for, the vendor's sampling methodology, parental notification practices, and the absence of required intervention steps. Dr. Wyatt and others emphasized the importance of corrective interventions (support, counseling or referral) rather than purely punitive measures.
After discussion the board approved an immediate change to replace the lifetime-ineligibility phrasing with language making the penalty apply to the remainder of the school year, and instructed staff to send the policy to the board policy subcommittee to develop a redrafted regulation that clarifies testing lists, random-selection procedures, notification, and the district's intervention supports for students who test positive.
The board requested a vendor report on random-selection methodology and semiannual testing reports for review during the policy subcommittee process.
