Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Transportation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves switch to EverDriven for some special‑needs routes over parent and driver objections
Summary
After public comment from drivers and parents warning that a rideshare model could disrupt routes for students with special needs, the Paramount Unified board voted 3–2 to approve a contract with EverDriven Technologies to replace some taxi-based transportation services.
The Paramount Unified School District board voted 3–2 on Sept. 10 to approve a contract with EverDriven Technologies Inc. to provide some student transportation services, a decision parents and current drivers said could harm students who rely on consistent, trained drivers.
Drivers representing the incumbent contractor and multiple parents urged the board to keep the existing service. "Is a $52,000 difference — less than 2% — worth disrupting a program with no complaints, consistent drivers, and strong community support?" asked a speaker representing the incumbent provider, urging board members to preserve parent choice.
A parent who said her child has special needs told the board that an abrupt change in drivers and vehicles can trigger meltdowns and refusals to attend school. "Uber drivers are not specifically trained to work with children who have special needs," she said, asking the board to involve families of special‑education students before making such a change.
Board discussion emphasized the need for transparency in procurement and concern about the impact of mid‑semester transitions. One board member said intensive supports required under individualized education plans must be preserved and that, if a support provider is not available on a route, the district must find qualified coverage to remain compliant with FAPE obligations.
Board members moved and seconded the measure to contract with EverDriven; during recorded online voting the motion passed by a 3–2 margin. Two student board members had earlier been recorded as abstaining during the discussion phase. The board did not specify immediate operational details in the meeting record; staff said contract execution follows board approval.
The public comment record included requests that the board consider driver wages, continuity of service, and whether a rideshare-style model can guarantee the specialized training and vetting families expect for students with high needs. The board also discussed the procurement process and promised to provide additional contract details as available.
The vote concluded action item 11.17. The board returned to closed session later in the evening.
