Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the District Goals And Assessment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Superintendent reviews district goals, cites large iReady gains

Swampscott School Committee · April 10, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Superintendent Galishman presented four district goals and told the committee the district has seen marked growth on the internal iReady assessments (which the district administers three times a year), while reporting high visibility and engagement metrics for staff and families.

Superintendent Galishman used the April 9 meeting to present district goals, implementation steps and assessment data the administration says show measurable student growth.

Galishman described four goals — a student-learning goal, two district-improvement goals and a professional-learning goal — and the indicators used to track progress, including the district’s Open Architects dashboards and the TeachPoint evaluation platform. "We're using data to improve targeted areas and that was...the root of it," Galishman said.

The superintendent cited iReady, an internal, adaptive assessment the district gives three times a year, as the source for several headline numbers shared with the committee: a 58% increase in K–4 ELA for targeted groups, a 102% increase in K–4 math growth, and mid-level gains in middle-school grades. Galishman and other staff emphasized that iReady is one measurement among several used to guide interventions, and noted that iReady scores are normed and adaptive. "I Ready is flawed...but it is...measured; it's one measurement," Galishman said.

Galishman also reported engagement metrics from recent surveys: about 89% of staff and 92% of families said the superintendent has been visible and engaged. He described a monthly superintendent newsletter, student cabinet meetings, expanded professional development and efforts to use data to support both the district’s lowest-performing students and those at the top of the achievement spectrum.

Board members asked for detail on the iReady figures; staff clarified that the percentages reflect growth measured on iReady (not MCAS) and explained how the district uses percentiles and norms to identify needs and target instruction. The superintendent said the district will continue to refine rollout and use of data tools and to expand student voice through the student cabinet.