Jefferson School leader outlines ‘Swords into Plowshares’ plan to repurpose melted Robert E. Lee bronze
Loading...
Summary
Andrea Douglas of the Jefferson School African American Heritage Center presented three finalist designs that would reuse bronze from the melted Robert E. Lee statue in distributed public artworks; the project will enter a community engagement phase and finalists are expected to be announced on July 10.
Andrea Douglas, executive director of the Jefferson School African American Heritage Center, told the Charlottesville City Council on April 8 that the Swords into Plowshares project is moving from an awareness phase into an intensive community engagement process. Douglas said the project will reuse bronze from the melted Robert E. Lee statue as part of site-specific public art intended to “turn your articles of war into plowshares.”
Douglas said an RFQ issued in February drew 32 responses and a four-person jury narrowed those to three finalist design teams: Hood Design Studio (Walter Hood), MASQ (Model of Architecture Serving Society) with artist Dana King, and Push Studio. Each team’s concept links the bronze to multiple sites across the city, with budgets for the centerpiece work in the neighborhood of $4 million and additional contingency funding planned for installation and landscape changes. Douglas said the project team aims to raise a contingency pool in the mid‑hundreds of thousands and to announce the finalist on July 10.
The presenters emphasized the project’s two phases: a public-awareness exhibition at the Jefferson School that runs through May 30 and a separate, design‑led community engagement process that will be led by the finalist design team once selected. Douglas said the Heritage Center is positioning itself as steward of the process rather than as the final decision maker, and described a 12‑member advisory council that includes historians, curators, landscape architects, therapists and descendants of enslaved people in central Virginia.
Council members asked how community input and the city’s parks master plan would affect siting. Several members pressed whether council would have a formal vote over locations such as Market Street Park; staff and Douglas replied the selection process is currently advisory and that any piece accepted into the city’s public art collection would require a later council action. Douglas said the finalists’ images are concept drawings rather than final plans, that they were selected with an expectation of extensive listening and revision, and that staff would return with more detail on permit, engineering and maintenance questions during the design and adoption phase.
Douglas described the project’s public‑education work so far: roughly 120 people have taken tours tied to the exhibition, and the team has posted documents and background on sipcville.com. She said designers were asked to demonstrate experience with descendant communities and public engagement and that the jury included historians and a descendant educator.
The presentations drew questions about maintenance and long‑term care if the city ultimately accepts a work into its collection. Staff respondents said that if the council adopts a piece into the public art collection, the city assumes ownership and maintenance responsibility, and that additional conversations with engineering and parks staff will be required during the final design. Douglas said each finalist’s budget includes fabricating and installation costs and that further conversations about feasibility with city engineers could alter final designs.
The project remains in the community engagement and fundraising stage; presenters urged continued public participation through the exhibition, upcoming “house parties” and the project website. The council did not take a final vote on siting or acceptance during the April 8 work session; staff said they would bring formal adoption or location actions back to the council for later consideration.
