Delegate Robin Grammer proposes bill to require same‑day disclosure after major wastewater plant failures
Loading...
Summary
Delegate Robin Grammer told the Education, Energy, and the Environment Committee that House Bill 16‑21 would require timely public explanations after bypasses or treatment failures at Maryland’s two largest wastewater plants and same‑day reporting of harmful effluent measurements to inform water users and nearby businesses.
Delegate Robin Grammer presented House Bill 16‑21 to the Education, Energy, and the Environment Committee, saying the measure would require timely public explanations of bypasses, overflows or treatment failures at Maryland’s two largest wastewater treatment plants and mandate same‑day disclosure of harmful effluent data tied to such failure events.
"House bill 16 21 puts in place public transparency at Maryland's 2 largest wastewater treatment plants in the case of a bypass or failure event," Grammer said, describing two central elements of the bill: prompt explanations of incidents and immediate release of data such as bacteria levels, suspended solids and effluent toxicity that could harm public health.
Grammer told committee members the bill would help inform "water goers, business operators, and property owners" and could reduce misinformation after visible signs at plants, noting that a recent consent decree required illumination of lights near effluent release areas and that those lights alone have sparked speculation about failures. "Providing a more clear explanation to the public of failure events will help community members be more informed, but it will also help plant operators and community leaders help deal with misinformation about plant failures," he said.
Vice Chair Kagan pressed Grammer on recent changes to the bill and on whether key stakeholders remained opposed. "In ENT, there was a lot of opposition testimony, and I see that the bill has been substantially gutted and amended. So I'm wondering whether the Department of the Environment, the Maryland Association of Municipal Wastewater Agency, and others, who had concerns have been mollified by the amendments," she said.
Grammer replied that the bill was amended first to address the Department of the Environment's concerns and then again to incorporate language provided by the wastewater treatment plant association and "Mako," which he said represented stakeholder input. "This is their language. So all the parties are on the same side of this fight now," Grammer said.
The hearing concluded with the sponsor asking for a favorable report; the transcript records no committee vote or formal action on the bill during this session. Chair closed the bill hearing and thanked Grammer and a guest noted in the transcript as J.B. Jennings. The committee moved on to a separate rules item before the provided transcript ends.
Next steps were not recorded in the provided transcript; no vote was taken on House Bill 16‑21 during the segment provided.
