Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Alcohol Waiver topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board sends 908 Avenue D alcohol waiver back for further review after parking and ADA concerns

Fort Pierce City Planning Board · June 10, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

An applicant seeking a waiver to sell beer and wine at 908 Avenue D was asked to return with legal parking/ADA access and buffering documentation. Staff had recommended disapproval because the adjacent lot used for parking is not controlled by the applicant and required landscaping, ADA-access and buffering are missing.

A convenience-store owner seeking a waiver-of-distance to sell beer and wine at 908 Avenue D was directed back to planning staff to resolve parking, ADA and buffering issues after staff said the application is not complete.

Staff told the board the proposed Ninth Street Food Market does not control the adjacent corner lot that is currently used informally for parking, lacks a formal off-street-parking plan, has no landscape or lighting on that lot, and sits within 500 feet of churches and day-care facilities — factors staff said do not meet the code’s minimum standards for a waiver of distance for alcoholic-beverage sales. Staff recommended the planning board move the application to the city commission for disapproval unless the applicant returns with required evidence of legal access, proper parking and buffering.

Applicant Yasir Mammad said he has been working with staff and that the building is older; he said the corner lot had been used for parking in the past but that the owner objected when a formalized parking arrangement was attempted. "I could do the handicap parking in the back," he said, but staff and board members pointed out the applicant currently has no legal access to the rear and therefore cannot demonstrate compliance with federal ADA requirements or city off-street-parking standards.

Given the outstanding deficiencies, the board voted to send the application back to the planning department for further review and asked the applicant to return with a completed application (parking/cross-access agreement or ownership, ADA compliance, landscaping and stormwater as applicable).

Next steps: applicant will work with planning staff to secure legal parking access or a cross-access agreement and address ADA/landscape requirements; the item will return to the board once documentation is provided.