Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Police Oversight topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council pauses police-oversight appointments after exodus from commission

San Diego City Council · January 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council voted to return Item 200 — appointments to the Commission on Police Practices — to staff, citing recent resignations and exit memos from commission leadership. Councilmember Von Wolpert moved the continuance; the motion passed (recorded 9–0).

Councilmembers voted on Jan. 13 to return Item 200 — the appointment of nominees to the Commission on Police Practices — to staff for further review after several recent resignations and newly released exit memos.

Councilmember Von Wolpert moved to continue the item and return it to staff, saying the commission has faced “significant challenges” including resignations of the executive director, general counsel, the chair and the vice chair and that the council should “pause and not appoint anyone at this day” until the exit memos were digested. Councilmember Campillo seconded the motion, which the council approved in a recorded vote that was recorded as unanimous 9–0.

The move followed public comment both urging caution and urging reform. Cesar Javier, a frequent public commenter, described concerns about leadership and oversight and urged accountability; Francine Maxwell, who identified herself as calling in, said the public should be included in any changes and encouraged community meetings. Staff confirmed the commission still has a quorum and can continue its work pending any future action by council.

The council thanked the nominees who participated and apologized for the scheduling change. Council members and staff said the continuance is intended to allow time to review the exit memos and determine whether structural changes or additional engagement are needed before new appointments proceed.

Next steps: the item will be returned to staff for additional review; no new hearing date was set during the Jan. 13 meeting.