Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Safety Cameras topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board rejects leased Flock camera contract after split roll-call vote

Village Board · October 22, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Police/public-safety staff proposed a leased license-plate camera system from Flock with a first-year net cost cited at $19,700 and a $37,700 contract total. After questions about term length and budget impacts, the motion failed on a 2–2–1 roll call (2 ayes, 2 nays, 1 abstention).

Police and public-safety staff asked trustees to approve a leased license-plate and camera system from vendor Flock, but trustees declined after a divided roll-call vote.

The presenter told the board the vendor had applied an additional $1,700 discount on the system. He described the first-year total as $19,700 and noted the full contract figure of $37,700.

Trustees questioned the contract term — the vendor’s standard term is 24 months, though staff said one-year options have been used elsewhere. A trustee also asked whether cameras are leased or owned; staff said the cameras are leased and vendor maintenance is included.

On a roll-call vote there were two ayes, two nays and one abstention; the chair announced the motion failed.

After the vote the chief reported a part-time officer had submitted a resignation to relocate to Texas.

Trustees discussed budget timing for multi-year contracts and noted that larger multi-year terms would need to be budgeted into future years if the board returns to the proposal.