Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Pedestrian Safety Crosswalk topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board OKs standard mid‑block crosswalk near Eagle Crest; flashing beacon added to 2027 CIP consideration

Board of Public Works and Utilities · April 8, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After reviewing three crosswalk designs and costs, the board approved a standard painted mid‑block crosswalk (Option 3) at the preferred location and requested a rapid‑flashing beacon be included for consideration in the 2027 capital improvement program; staff will consult the YMCA and return if substantive issues arise.

The Onalaska Board of Public Works and Utilities voted April 7 to proceed with a standard painted mid‑block crosswalk at a location staff and traffic engineers recommended near the Eagle Crest/Y area, while asking staff to include a rapid‑flashing beacon for consideration in the 2027 capital improvement program.

Public works staff presented three site options and three crosswalk configurations. Jared Holter described the engineer’s recommendation: “It is recommended that if a mid‑block crosswalk is installed, location 2 would be the preferred option.” He gave cost estimates for three configurations: a full bump‑out with curb, gutter and storm work (about $40,000); a center‑island refuge ($8,000) with the loss of about three on‑street parking spaces; and a standard painted crosswalk with ADA ramps (about $4,000), which also would remove three parking stalls.

Board members raised maintenance concerns, snow‑plow impacts and bicycle conflicts with bump‑outs. One member said the center island would offer the most refuge; another said residents prefer a crosswalk close to a driveway. Committee member (speaker 4) moved to adopt Option 3, include a flashing beacon in the 2027 CIP, and have staff consult the YMCA and return if that conversation raises substantive issues; the motion was seconded and carried unanimously.

Staff said the $4,000 standard crosswalk and the $8,000 center‑island option both could be absorbed in existing budgets under miscellaneous or CIP funds, while the $40,000 bump‑out would need to be added to the capital improvements budget. The board directed staff to proceed and coordinate outreach with the YMCA and neighborhood stakeholders.