Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Future Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee receives primer on future land use and growth-area choices
Summary
Consultant Allie explained how a future land-use map differs from zoning, outlined required components (map, categories, policies, implementation plan), and led a discussion about growth-area types and statutory expectations tied to recent legislation.
Consultant Allie walked the Auburn Comprehensive Planning Committee through the goals and mechanics of a future land-use map and how it will inform later zoning decisions.
Allie emphasized that the future land-use plan is a policy document — not zoning — and described required components: community engagement summary, a future land-use map, land-use category descriptions, policies and actions, regional coordination approach, and an implementation strategy. "A future land use map is a long-term vision for how land in the community should be used," Allie said, noting it is more flexible and aspirational than zoning.
She explained three broad growth-area types: growth areas (where the city expects the highest growth), transition or limited-growth areas (buffers between denser and rural places), and rural/non-growth areas. The consultant urged the committee to start with guiding principles (for example, proximity to water/sewer and avoiding critical natural resources) and then apply those to a map.
Committee members asked whether the process should begin with prior plan designations and how statutory expectations affect growth-area labels. One member cited recent state legislative actions (LD 2003 and LD 1829) and urged care because those laws tie statutory expectations (particularly around housing) to growth-area designations. Allie responded that the committee should agree on principles and expectations before applying categories to a map.
Allie also presented examples from other towns (Bridgdon and Ellsworth) to show different ways communities delineate growth boundaries and land-use categories. The committee discussed labeling conventions ("areas" vs. "zones"), map contiguity, and when a growth boundary might run through a parcel due to infrastructure constraints. The group agreed staff will prepare maps and options for the October meeting, then conduct public outreach during January and refine policies through early spring ahead of anticipated council presentations next summer.
Next procedural steps: staff and consultant will prepare draft maps and policy options, post materials online for community input, and bring refined alternatives back to the committee in November and December with a public-input window in January.
