Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Ordinance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning Board recommends changes to domesticated-chickens ordinance, favors a 2-acre threshold

Cumberland Planning Board · January 21, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After public comment and board debate about neighborhood impacts and state law, the Planning Board voted unanimously to recommend amendments to Cumberland Code of Ordinances 3-15-39 on domesticated chickens, directing staff to refine language (board expressed preference for a 2-acre threshold).

The Cumberland Planning Board voted to recommend amendments to the town's domesticated-chickens ordinance (Cumberland Code of Ordinances 3-15-39) and directed staff to refine the language for council consideration.

Bridgette, the town planner, explained staff recommended removing a $10 licensing requirement and retaining the term "chickens" to be specific about species. Board members and several public commenters debated whether to limit domesticated chickens by lot size (1 acre vs. 2 acres), whether a strict per-lot cap (six chickens) should remain, and how recent state changes (LD 1829 and related state adjustments referenced during the discussion) affect municipal authority—particularly for multi-unit housing.

Members cited neighborhood concerns about noise and odor and the possibility that removing acreage limits could allow dozens of chickens on small parcels. Options discussed included restoring a licensing requirement, keeping a numerical cap of six per lot, applying performance standards (no odor beyond the property line) or setting a 2-acre threshold. After debate the board expressed a preference for a 2-acre approach and S4 moved that the board recommend the amended chapter to the town council as revised; the motion was seconded and carried by voice vote recorded as unanimous.

The recommendation returns to the town council with staff-drafted language reflecting the board's direction. The council will consider the proposed ordinance changes and any additional public comment at that stage.