Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rezoning 1253 A1A topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning and Advisory Board declines to recommend rezoning for Park Avenue property after residents raise safety, precedent concerns
Summary
Satellite Beach residents urged the Planning and Advisory Board not to change the comprehensive plan or rezone 1253 A1A to commercial, citing pedestrian-safety incidents, limited parking and the risk of setting a precedent; the board moved to not recommend the change and asked whether the applicant would attend future meetings.
Get email alerts on the Rezoning 1253 A1A topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Planning and Advisory Board in Satellite Beach heard hours of comment and discussion before moving not to recommend a change to the comprehensive plan and zoning for 1253 A1A, a small parcel near Park Avenue beach access.
Carl, a city staff member presenting the request, told the board that the site has operated in a commercial fashion for years and that the applicant seeks to amend the comp plan and rezone from RM-3 (residential mixed-use) to commercial. "1253 Highway A 1 A has been commercial use for years and years and years. Currently, it's an engineer's office," Carl said. He warned that the lot’s small size and parking constraints would limit most intensive commercial uses.
Neighbor Russell Green urged the board to preserve the area’s residential character and to reject the zoning change, saying the beach access is pedestrian-heavy and near two recent fatal pedestrian crashes. "I'm requesting on behalf of the residents that the property zoning is not altered," Green said, noting safety, uniqueness, precedent and a lack of neighborhood support. Stephanie Hill, a nearby resident, said there are vacant commercially zoned lots nearby and warned that "any extra traffic would definitely, put a damper on things." Daniel Genovese cited a 1993 building permit on the city's permitting website that lists a commercial permit at the address, saying that historical record confirms some prior commercial use.
Board members discussed options including tabling the item to require the applicant to attend a future meeting, or recommending against the change. Several members raised the possibility of using a binding development plan if the applicant consented to limit future uses, but one member cautioned the board cannot impose such a limitation without the applicant's agreement. The board also noted that nonconforming businesses may continue to operate under current rules and that severe storm damage could affect whether a future rebuild could be commercial.
After public comment and internal discussion, a member moved that the board "not recommend" approval of the comprehensive-plan/zoning change for 1253 A1A; the motion was seconded. Chair Cherry confirmed the motion and closed discussion on that agenda item, and the board advised that the applicant could be invited to a future meeting to answer neighbors' questions.
The board did not adopt new zoning itself; its role is advisory, and any actual change would require City Council action. The board emphasized there is no immediate urgency and that the item could be revisited when the applicant is present.
What’s next: The board left open the option to ask the applicant to appear at a later meeting for more information before City Council considers any formal rezoning request.
