Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Curriculum topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Parent criticizes 9/11 lesson; board promises review of curriculum guidance

Wayne Township Public School District Board of Education · September 16, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A parent told the Wayne Township Board that a district 9/11 lesson 'whitewashed' history, prompting board members to defend teachers, point to a district FAQ and agree to consider standardized curriculum guidance and a committee to review controversial topics.

A resident sharply criticized how Wayne Township classrooms handled Sept. 11, urging the Board of Education to revisit district guidance and standardize how "controversial" topics are taught.

Rebecca Bradley, who identified herself as a parent and resident, told the board that her fifth-grade daughter returned from school without hearing names and terms Bradley said were central to the attacks, including "Osama bin Laden," "Al Qaeda" and "terrorist." "There never was in the past. There should not be now," Bradley said, adding that the district was "willfully erasing" important history.

Board members and district officials responded that the materials shared with teachers were intended as age-appropriate guidance, not a districtwide ban on teaching the facts of Sept. 11. One education committee member said schools held moments of silence and other age-appropriate activities across buildings that day and that a district-provided FAQ and lesson were shared to help teachers who opt to address the subject.

At least two board members and other speakers urged the district to create a standardized curriculum or a review committee for controversial topics so teachers have clear, board-approved materials. "We're going to sit down and talk" about a committee and curricular guidance, one board member said, describing the idea as a way to protect teachers and provide consistent messaging across grades.

The discussion clarified that the contested guidance originated as an internal communication and was not voted on by the board. Officials said the district will examine whether to centralize guidance for future years and to provide grade-appropriate, board-reviewed materials so teachers and parents understand what will be taught.

The board recessed to executive session later in the meeting to handle legal matters and said it would return and vote on items after that session. This curriculum review was described as a follow-up priority by education committee members.