Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Commercial Lease Extension topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lawmakers split over override attempt for lease-extension bill; opponents warn of 'sweetheart deals'
Summary
A push to override the governor's veto on a bill allowing longer commercial lease extensions drew sharp objections from senators who said the change could lock in low rents and bypass competitive procurement; the Legislature placed the override into the voting file after debate.
The Vice Speaker moved to act on Veto Bill 176-38 COR, which would add a new subsection to Guam Code Annotated allowing certain commercial lease extensions. The motion to consider the override prompted a lengthy debate over whether the change would help keep businesses open or enable preferential, long-term lease deals that deprive the public of competitive returns.
Senator Lai objected strongly to the override, saying the bill "would allow for commercial leases of government property...to be extended for up to 30 years without legislative oversight" and contended the proposal "is a lie that this is for small businesses," warning it treats large companies and small family firms the same and could undermine fair procurement.
Opponents cited the governor's veto message claiming the change could create special deals that bypass bidding and legislative review; they argued long leases without competition could lock in rents below market value and harm government revenue. "Nothing presented during the hearings or debates justified offering existing leases special deals while new businesses are effectively locked out of competition," one senator said, summarizing the veto rationale.
Vice Speaker countered that allowing some lease extensions helps retain local employers and keeps businesses operating during a fragile economic period, noting openings and closures at the airport and in Tumon. "When you go to the airport, you see an exodus of people going out, not coming in," the Vice Speaker said, arguing lease stability can protect jobs and tax revenues.
Following debate that included concerns about fiscal impacts, fairness and procurement principles, the body voted to place the override motion into the voting file for a future recorded vote.
Next steps: the override was placed into the voting file; a subsequent session will record the final vote on the governor's veto and the bill's future.
