Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Regulations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Laramie County delays vote on wide land‑use overhaul after packed public hearing
Summary
After hours of public comment, the Board of Commissioners postponed three linked land‑use items (regulations, zone‑map amendment, fee schedule) to July 15 to incorporate community feedback and clarify impacts ranging from accessory dwelling units to adult gaming and annexation concerns.
Get email alerts on the Land Use Regulations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Laramie County Board of Commissioners on July 1 heard extended public comment on proposed 2025 Land Use Regulations, an unincorporated zone‑district map amendment and a Planning & Development fee schedule and voted to postpone final action to July 15 to allow staff time to incorporate public feedback.
Justin Arnold, Laramie County Planning and Development, explained the three documents have been in development for more than two years and that the Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval on June 26. Arnold described specific changes, including an exemption from a code requirement for fire‑barrier spray on closed‑cell foam in non‑habitable accessory structures and new provisions for accessory dwelling units to increase housing supply.
Residents from multiple neighborhoods—Greg Golovanov, Cesar Garcia, Clarence Fisher, Kevin Scott, Kathleen Tuttle, Sue Palmer, Frank Waters and others—raised concerns about constitutional protections, the process, adult entertainment/gaming facilities, annexation risk, HOA impacts, RV and tiny‑home living limits, and the size and complexity of the draft regulations. "I have some real concerns about adopting these regulations and the harm that they can do to the citizens," said Greg Golovanov. Cesar Garcia urged clearer treatment of adult gaming and proximity to homes and schools.
Planning staff said several clarifications and amendments already were incorporated in response to public feedback (including amnesty for existing small businesses and conditional‑use permitting for potentially intensive commercial uses) and offered to meet with neighborhood groups. "We included them all in this public hearing because they are tied together. You can't really have one without the other," Arnold said, noting the county will post revised materials in advance of the July 15 hearing.
After discussion, a motion to postpone items 21–23 passed unanimously. The board urged residents to review the posted updates and invited staff to meet neighborhood associations prior to the next hearing.
Next step: staff will refine exhibits and references, incorporate feasible public suggestions and return the regulations, the map amendment and the fee schedule for public hearing and a decision on July 15.
