Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Union and public commenters press district on canine searches and layoffs; vendor pitches digital yearbook
Summary
During public comment, a CSEA representative urged the district to rethink how canine contraband detection is used in schools to avoid unnecessarily detaining students; a union representative also described recent layoffs and asked to participate in superintendent interview panels, and a vendor pitched a digital yearbook and attendance product.
Two public commenters used the board's public comment period to press the district on separate issues.
Fawn Petersen, speaking for the California School Employees Association (Chapter 007), raised concerns about a proposed renewal of a contract with a canine contraband detection vendor. "The dogs that they use are trained to detect marijuana. Marijuana is legal," Petersen said, and described situations in which students were held while staff processed them even though no contraband was ultimately found. Petersen urged the district to consider how to deploy detection services so students are not needlessly detained or staff time is not tied up.
Petersen later addressed layoffs in a longer CSEA report: she said 59 classified employees received layoff notices, HR rescinded 12 prior to meetings, and 3 classified employees received complete layoffs without an offered position. Petersen asked the board to reevaluate whether CSEA should be allowed to participate on superintendent interview panels per provisions she cited in the parties' contract; she said the request had been denied when previously raised.
Victor Ward, a vendor, used his three-minute public comment to pitch "real time," a digital yearbook he described as a supplement to traditional yearbooks, and a separate product he asserted would improve attendance revenue. Ward suggested Prop 28 funds could help seed such programs and estimated (without documentation) that the district loses about $5,000,000 due to chronic absenteeism and that his product could generate about $275,000 per day. The board did not respond to the public commenters during the comment period, noting the district cannot engage in discussion or take formal action on items raised in public comment.
No formal action was taken on the contract or the vendor pitch during the meeting; the consent agenda (which included the vendor contract renewal) was moved and approved by the board earlier in the meeting.
