Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Satellite Beach planning board declines to recommend rezoning for 1253 A1A after resident safety, precedent concerns
Summary
The Planning and Advisory Board voted not to recommend changing 1253 A1A from RM3 (residential mixed use) to commercial after residents cited pedestrian-safety, parking and precedent concerns and the applicant did not attend to answer questions.
Get email alerts on the Land Use Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Satellite Beach Planning and Advisory Board on a recent night voted to not recommend a proposed change to the comprehensive plan and zoning for 1253 A1A, a small parcel currently used as an engineering office, after residents urged the board to preserve the site's residential classification.
Planner staff presented the request, saying the property has long operated in a commercial manner but is zoned RM3 (residential mixed use). The planner told the board the applicant seeks a comprehensive-plan amendment and a zoning map change to commercial to regularize the nonconforming use and allow additional options for the site. Board members and staff repeatedly noted the lot’s small size and limited parking would constrain redevelopment.
Residents who live near Park Avenue told the board the site sits adjacent to a heavily used pedestrian beach access and that additional commercial activity could worsen safety and parking problems. “I’m requesting on behalf of the residents that the property zoning is not altered,” Russell Green said, adding the area has only one street parking spot at the beach access. Stephanie Hill, who said she was representing nearby homeowners, told the board she counted multiple vacant commercial-zoned lots within a half-mile and urged the city to use those before converting residential parcels.
Resident Daniel Genovese said a 1993 commercial building permit exists for the site and warned the board that rezoning could open the door to future demolition and denser rebuilding. “That’s what we fear,” Genovese said, describing the community’s concern that a future owner could seek a larger, more imposing structure if the site were rezoned.
Board members discussed several options: recommending approval, recommending denial (leaving the site as RM3), or tabling the matter until the applicant attended. Several members emphasized the board’s role is advisory and that any change would be forwarded to city council. One board member moved that the board not recommend the change; the motion was seconded and the board recorded aye votes in favor of the motion.
The applicant did not appear at the meeting to answer questions from neighbors or board members. Board members said waiting for the applicant was an option but, given the public opposition and limited local demand for additional commercial space, they were reluctant to recommend rezoning. The matter will be transmitted to city council with the board’s recommendation not to approve the comprehensive-plan and zoning change.
Record of action: The board made and carried a motion not to recommend changing 1253 A1A from RM3 to commercial. The motion was seconded; the chair called the roll and the motion passed with recorded "Aye" responses from members present.
What’s next: Because the Planning and Advisory Board’s recommendation is advisory, any formal change must still be considered and acted on by the City Council; the council will receive the board’s recommendation and can review the matter at a future meeting.
