Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House fails to advance bill barring immigration enforcement on school grounds
Summary
A floor recall to advance House File 3435 — which would prohibit federal immigration enforcement on school grounds without a judicial warrant and require identification and notification to school officials — failed on a 67‑67 tie after hours of testimony from legislators and survivors.
A motion to recall House File 3435 to the General Register failed on a 67‑67 tie after extended floor debate on March 25, 2026.
Representative Jordan, the motion’s sponsor, framed the recall as a step to protect students and school staff from what she described as traumatic federal immigration enforcement operations. "This bill prohibits schools from allowing immigration action on school grounds unless they are presented with a judicial warrant," Jordan said, urging colleagues to "choose the safety of our kids over a federal agency." She cited incidents in Minneapolis where federal officers were present at or near school campuses and described lasting impacts on attendance and students’ mental health.
Supporters said the bill would preserve sensitive spaces and limit disruptive enforcement near schools. Representative Kraft, who joined Jordan in urging prompt consideration, said teachers and bus drivers have reported classrooms and dismissals interrupted by federal activity.
Opponents questioned the bill’s practical effect and whether it would meaningfully change enforcement: Representative Bennett argued the measure "does not stop immigration enforcement" and noted the bill allows superintendents to deny warrants and could be procedurally incomplete. Other members noted the bill had not passed committee and raised concerns about mandatory referrals and technical language that had not been vetted in judiciary committee.
The House went under call for a roll call vote after requests from members on both sides; after the clerk closed the roll, the chair announced a 67‑67 tie and said "the motion does not prevail." No further action was taken that day.
Why it matters: Supporters contend the bill would reduce disruptions to classroom learning and trauma for students and staff. Opponents say it may not change enforcement practice and that committee review is the appropriate next step.
What’s next: With the motion defeated, supporters said they could pursue amendments on the floor or continue negotiations in committee before the session deadline.
Sources: Floor debate and roll call on March 25, 2026, Minnesota House Chamber. Quotes attributed to Representative Jordan and Representative Bennett, per the House transcript.
