Citizen Portal
Sign In

Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows

Student-backed bill would bar 'reef safe' claims on sunscreens that contain chemical UV filters

California State Assembly (committee) · April 7, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

AB 17 44 would prohibit labeling sunscreen as "reef safe" or similar if the product contains chemical UV filters; a high-school Eco Club member and environmental groups supported the transparency-focused measure while the Personal Care Product Council raised concerns about implications for industry.

A California State Assembly committee advanced AB 17 44, the "Clear Labels, Clear Seas Act," which would prevent sunscreen products containing chemical ultraviolet filters from being labeled as "reef safe," "reef friendly" or similar.

Assemblymember Addis, the bill's author, told the committee rocky-reef ecosystems are vital to biodiversity, fisheries and coastal tourism and said scientific studies show certain chemical UV filters can disrupt photosynthesis, damage DNA and contribute to coral bleaching. "Products that are marketed as reef safe, reef friendly, or any other term that implies either of those cannot contain chemical ultraviolet filters," the author said.

Mikaela Spencer, a high school junior representing the McClatchy High School Eco Club, testified in support and described peer-reviewed research and NOAA findings she said show small amounts of chemical filters can affect coral larvae and other marine life. "Consumers deserve accurate information, and our marine ecosystems deserve stronger protection," she told the committee.

Juliana Tetlow of Fearless Advocacy, speaking for the Surfrider Foundation, voiced strong support. Craig Schoeller of the Personal Care Product Council said his organization's current position was "concern" and asked the committee to avoid language that might be read as saying mineral sunscreens are the only safe option; he said the council appreciated recent catchall amendments but sought clarity to avoid future unwarranted bans.

Committee members praised the student testimony and stressed the bill is intended to increase transparency rather than ban particular products. The committee recorded the measure as reported out (consent calendar) and advanced it toward appropriations.