Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Remote Services Idd topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Sen. Reyes seeks to enshrine remote services option for Californians with IDD

Senate Human Services Committee · April 6, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

SB 969 would codify COVID-era remote service options for Californians with intellectual and developmental disabilities, directing the Department of Developmental Services to create guidelines and communication so families can choose remote supports without mandating their use.

Senator Maria Elena Reyes presented SB 969 on the Senate Human Services Committee floor, saying the bill "simply codifies the option for remote service delivery" so that Californians with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) can continue to access day programs, independent living services and behavioral therapy remotely after the current emergency authority expires on Dec. 31, 2026.

The bill’s author told the committee that remote services “have proven to be highly effective,” increasing independence and access for individuals and families. Supporters testified that tele‑programming preserved continuity of care when families moved and helped clients with anxiety or health vulnerabilities participate safely. Sarah Verdi of Ability Path described remote classes — from Zumba to life‑skills training — as “real time engagement” that keeps participants connected and learning. Emily Chouvard of the California Disability Services Association said many program participants cannot attend in‑person services because providers are not available in their region.

Multiple self‑advocates and family members told personal stories about how remote services preserved supports and social connection. One witness said: "This program is the best part of my day. I never get bored and I'm always learning." Advocates framed SB 969 as consistent with the Lanterman Act’s person‑centered approach and emphasized the bill does not mandate remote services but requires DDS to set clear guidelines and ensure families know the option exists.

Committee staff noted the bill will require statutory authority for the Department of Developmental Services to continue remote service delivery after the pandemic emergency authority ends. The committee did not receive opposition testimony. After quorum was established later in the hearing, the committee clerk called the roll and moved SB 969 to the Appropriations Committee for further consideration.

The committee placed SB 969 on call for absent members; no final floor action occurred during this hearing.