Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Short Term Rentals topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission hears short‑term rental survey; commissioners press for clear definitions and targeted controls

Albany County Planning and Zoning Commission · February 12, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Albany County planning staff presented results of a 147‑response short‑term rental survey and offered four regulatory options. Commissioners supported adding clear definitions and using conditional‑use review or overlay districts to limit rentals in specific zones.

Planning staff presented a December survey on short‑term rentals that collected 147 responses and showed a split of opinion across the county.

Staff (David, S9) summarized the results: "Albany County residents were about 86% of the responses...49% strongly support or supported short term rentals, 34% were opposed, and 17% were neutral," and cautioned that the survey allowed multiple submissions and therefore is not a statistically rigorous poll.

Commissioners used the survey as a starting point for policy discussion. One commissioner urged the commission to "add definitions of short term rentals versus motels, and we establish what we think are appropriate conditions" (S3). Commissioners discussed four broad regulatory options offered by staff: 1) minimal regulation via a zoning certificate, 2) moderate regulation requiring conditional‑use permits in residential zones, 3) prohibition or limitations in specific zoning districts (overlays), or 4) do nothing. Several commissioners said they favored a targeted approach — defining terms, requiring conditional‑use review in some residential categories, and attaching enforceable conditions (parking plans, trash disposal, on‑site representative) rather than a countywide ban.

A recurring theme was definition and enforcement. Commissioners and staff noted that bed‑and‑breakfasts are currently treated as conditional uses while many modern short‑term rentals (Airbnb/VRBO) are not defined in the county code. Staff suggested using lodging‑tax records as one avenue to quantify existing short‑term rental activity and said some jurisdictions regulate by owner‑occupancy or by issuing annual permits.

Next steps: Staff will refine draft language including definitions and possible zoning categories for controls; commissioners directed staff to keep working on options and return with proposed code language for public review.

Sources: Staff presentation and survey summary (S9); commission discussion and direction to staff (meeting record).