Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Teacher Assignment Reporting topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

District reports 91.5% "clear" teaching assignments on new CDE TAMO data; board urges data review

Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified Board of Education · August 1, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Dr. Wildy told the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified board that the California Department of Education’s teaching assignment monitoring outcomes (TAMO) report shows 91.5% clear teaching assignments for the district; board members pressed staff to reconcile reporting differences so next year’s dashboard better reflects internal data.

At the special meeting on July 31, Dr. Wildy presented the district’s update to the 2024–25 local indicators tied to the California Dashboard and explained that the California Department of Education’s Teaching Assignment Monitoring Outcomes (TAMO) data will appear on the district’s 2024 dashboard.

Dr. Wildy said the district’s TAMO report shows 91.5% clear teaching assignments, a slight increase from prior years, and noted the first year of the system reported 89.6%. He told the board that differences in reporting — including missing CLAD certificates on some teachers, course coding for CTE classes, and teachers assigned to sections outside their credential — are likely driving the discrepancy between internal district counts and the TAMO results.

Board members asked procedural questions about how TAMO counts are generated. Speaker 2 asked whether TAMO counts teachers as individuals or counts assignments by section; Dr. Wildy clarified TAMO looks at each assignment/section and that the district must dig into combined reports (CALPADS and CALSAAS) to ensure accurate data imports. The presenter said staff expect to improve the percentage next year once data imports and coding are corrected.

The item was presented for discussion only; no board action was required. Board members asked staff to investigate the data sources and report back so the district’s public dashboard better aligns with internal records and the board’s expectations.