Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified board approves rehiring of retired employee before CalPERS waiting period
Summary
After a closed session, the Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District Board of Education announced it approved employee AN 8129192 to perform critically needed services before the 180‑day CalPERS post‑retirement waiting period; the board reported a 5–0 vote and provided limited public detail.
The Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District Board of Education announced on Aug. 14 that it approved a request allowing employee AN 8129192 to perform critically needed services before the standard 180‑day post‑retirement waiting period required by CalPERS regulations. The board announced the action after reconvening from a closed session and reported the vote as 5–0.
The action was disclosed when the board returned to open session at 12:37 p.m. The Chair said, "The board took action in closed session to approve employee AN 8129192 to perform critically needed services as determined by the district," and noted the decision was made pursuant to CalPERS rules governing post‑retirement reemployment.
The meeting began at 11:30 a.m. with the Pledge of Allegiance led by Board member Dean and approval of the special meeting agenda. During the initial roll call the Chair announced the motion passed 3–0; staff later informed the board that remote participant Linda Reed had voted yes while muted, and the Chair confirmed the final vote tally as 5–0. As Ms. Wescott told the board, "Linda Reed just let me know that she did vote yes. She was muted at the time that she voted yes for the agenda." The board adjourned immediately after announcing the closed‑session action.
The Chair also said the board had recessed to closed session to discuss two matters: conference with legal counsel regarding anticipated litigation under Government Code section 54956.9 (one case) concerning allegations of national origin discrimination (OCR case number 64), and conference with the district's labor negotiator. No additional details were released about the anticipated litigation or labor negotiations when the board returned to open session.
There was no public comment on the closed‑session items; the Chair had described public‑comment procedures at the start of the meeting and directed commenters to pvpusd.net/feedback for submission instructions.
The district did not provide the name of the employee beyond the administrative number referenced in the public announcement, and the board did not disclose any specific terms of the reemployment (length of assignment, compensation, or supervising department) in open session. The board gave the estimated reconvene time as 12:30 p.m., but returned at 12:37 p.m. The action was described as approval "to perform critically needed services," and the Chair referenced CalPERS regulations as the governing authority for the 180‑day rule.
The board did not take further public action before adjourning. No future meeting date or follow‑up reporting requirement was announced during the open session.
