Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Government Operations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Board approves minutes, consent agenda, investment policy and ordinances; subdivision passes 4–1
Summary
The Carson City Board of Supervisors took multiple formal actions: approved December 18 minutes and the consent agenda unanimously; adopted the treasurer's investment policy unanimously; adopted ordinances (Bill 107 and Bill 108) unanimously; approved tentative subdivision map SUB2025‑0399 by 4–1; and adopted Bill 109 (zoning) with a 4–1 vote.
At its January meeting the Carson City Board of Supervisors recorded the following formal actions.
- Minutes: The board unanimously approved the minutes of the Dec. 18 meeting.
- Consent agenda: The board unanimously approved the consent agenda (items 8A, 9A, 10A, 11A, 12A–C, 13A–B, 14A).
- Investment policy (Agenda 16A): Treasurer Andrew Razor presented the annual investment policy; the board voted unanimously to adopt the policy as presented.
- Ordinance — Bill 107 / Ordinance 2026‑1 (Agenda 18A): An amendment to the Silver Oaks PUD modifying front‑yard setback standards for a side‑loaded garage option in specified phases was adopted on second reading unanimously.
- Ordinance — Bill 108 / Ordinance 2026‑2 (Agenda 18B): A fifth addendum to the development agreement with Silver Oak Development Company was adopted on second reading unanimously.
- Tentative subdivision map — SUB2025‑0399 (Agenda 18C): The board approved a tentative subdivision map for Blackstone Ranch South (103 single‑family lots and off‑site Railroad Drive extension) subject to staff conditions. The motion passed 4 yes, 1 no (Supervisor White voted no). Staff clarified the pro‑rata road deposit has not yet been paid and the 10‑year timing begins when final map and fees are submitted.
- Ordinance — Bill 109 / Ordinance 2026‑3 (Agenda 18D): Zoning changes for parcels at 303 S. Rupp Street and 515 E. Musser Street were adopted; the roll call reflected 4 yeses and 1 no.
Why it matters: These actions advance land‑use approvals and implement routine governance steps (minutes, consent, investment policy). The subdivision approval moves a 103‑lot project forward subject to conditions and a split vote.
