Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Commission approves special-use permit for state office complex near downtown Carson City
Summary
The Planning Commission approved a special-use permit for a state office complex at Stewart and 5th Streets that includes two 64,876 sq ft office buildings and a four-story parking garage; the approval follows a recent master-plan amendment and staff findings that the city has zoning jurisdiction under NRS 278.580.
The Carson City Planning Commission voted to approve a special-use permit for a proposed state office complex at the southeast corner of South Stewart Street and East 5th Street, allowing two new office buildings and a four-story parking garage to proceed under conditions adopted by staff and amended on the record.
Planning staff described the project and traced its review history. "The applicant's proposing two new office buildings, each 64,876 square feet, and a four-story parking garage, which will be roughly 155,789 square feet, and 275 surface parking spaces," planning staff member Hope said, summarizing the site plan and landscaping commitments. Staff told commissioners the project needed a special-use permit because the zoning is P and explained the Board of Supervisors had recently initiated and adopted master-plan amendments affecting downtown character-area mapping.
Why it matters: the Commission’s approval clears the way for state-led development on a site the Board removed from the downtown character map earlier this year and affirms staff’s reading of Nevada statute on local zoning jurisdiction. "NRS 278.580 ... gives Carson City zoning jurisdiction," Hope said, noting the statute applies to state uses not existing at the site before April 23, 1971.
During more than an hour of questioning, commissioners pressed staff and the applicant on sidewalk widths, growth-management triggers for water use, phased traffic analysis and whether the project constitutes piecemeal development. Steven Poteo, representing development engineering, said the traffic-impact study recommended a deceleration lane and that future phases will be evaluated holistically: "So when phase 2 of the state complex does move forward, they will be looking at the site as a whole."
Kevin Kaminer, director of TSK Architects, described the design approach, material palette and security considerations for state facilities: "These buildings are intended to speak to the entirety of the state ... they are intended to communicate, I think, the ethic of the state, which is that they wanted them to feel more modern." He also said parapets are designed to conceal rooftop systems and that any future antenna needs would be handled later as required.
The applicant, Brian Walker, deputy administrator with the State Public Works Division, confirmed the state found the amended conditions acceptable. "Yes. I've read those, and those are acceptable to us," Walker said.
Action taken: a commissioner moved to approve the special-use permit based on staff findings and subject to amended conditions; the motion was seconded and the Commission voted to approve. The approval included changes to conditions 2, 7 and 8, recorded on the public record.
Next steps: the approval implements the Commission's findings and conditions; project elements that require right-of-way permits (driveway connections, utilities and conditioned pathways) will proceed through city encroachment/site-improvement review, and future project phases will require additional traffic and site analyses as they are proposed.
