Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Right Of Way Abandonment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission recommends partial abandonment of Monitor Peak Street with amended conditions on utilities and easements
Summary
The commission recommended the Board of Supervisors approve the abandonment of about 5,347 sq ft of Monitor Peak Street after negotiating modified conditions requiring documentation acknowledgement, bonding option for water main removal, and city‑engineer approval of necessary easements prior to recordation.
The Carson City Planning Commission on April 30 voted to recommend the Board of Supervisors approve the partial abandonment of Monitor Peak Street, about 5,347 square feet, contingent on modified conditions that address utility and easement concerns.
Staff planner Heather Manzo said the segment is a paper street created by earlier subdivision mapping and that there is an existing water main in the area that must be addressed before recordation. Staff originally proposed requirements that included removal of the water main and demonstrable utility adjustments. Applicant representative Justin Moore, a professional land surveyor, told the commission that title reports and other documents had already been provided and asked that the conditions be clarified to avoid duplicative submittals. Moore also said the developer has bonded plans to remove the water main and has reserved easements intended to protect utilities.
City engineering and public works staff said removing utilities before recordation is the city preference because owning and maintaining utilities on private property creates long‑term maintenance burdens; staff agreed that bonding could be acceptable in lieu of immediate removal if the developer provides a bond ensuring the work will be completed. Commissioners and staff negotiated amended language: (1) condition 1 will acknowledge submitted documentation to avoid subsequent requests for already‑provided items; (2) condition 4 will allow bonding as an option instead of immediate physical removal of the water main prior to recordation; and (3) condition 5 will require that, prior to recordation, any easements necessary to protect utilities be included to the satisfaction of the city engineer.
With those changes accepted by the applicant, the commission voted to recommend abandonment to the Board of Supervisors. Staff noted that the abandonment is subject to final engineering details, easement reservations and recordation of the abandonment documents; the lot line adjustments the applicant intends to process will follow the abandonment as a separate administrative action.
The commission’s recommendation includes direction for the applicant to either remove the water main or provide an approved bond and to secure the city‑engineer’s approval of any required easements before recordation. The Board of Supervisors will take the final action.
