Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Broadband Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Elko County Commission votes to oppose federal bill it says would preempt local control over wireless siting

Elko County Board of County Commissioners · March 18, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Elko County Board voted to send a letter opposing H.R. 2289 (the American Broadband Deployment Act of 2025), arguing the bill would strip local authority over siting, design and operation of wireless infrastructure and remove community safeguards.

The Elko County Board of Commissioners voted to send a letter opposing H.R. 2289, commonly called the American Broadband Deployment Act of 2025, saying the federal measure would curtail local control over wireless communication siting and design.

Chair (speaker 1) introduced the item and described the bill as federal legislation that would "significantly limit state and local authority over the siting, design and operation of wireless communication infrastructure." Staff member Curtis (speaker 6) summarized that the bill would largely codify recent FCC rules and preempt many local requirements tied to wireless-tower siting.

Commissioners raised concerns about losing local discretion over placement and appearance of equipment. "I think strengthening this type of infrastructure is appropriate and good, but I also think we need local control," Chair said during the discussion. Commissioner (speaker 2) added that the county needs "more flexibility, not less," and raised local complaints about recent tower placements.

During the public-comment period on the action item, Scott Gavorski (speaker 7) said he rose on behalf of the Oakland County Republican Party and urged the board to oppose the bill, saying the county should defend "government closest to the people" and warning that locally unknown siting could create safety burdens the county would bear.

The board voted by voice to approve drafting and sending the opposition letter. No roll-call tally was recorded in the transcript; the item passed on a voice vote.