Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Fair Share Funds topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning staff explain fair-share funds, lapsed appropriations; council urges timelier reporting

Communications Reports and Council Oversight Committee · March 17, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Long Range Planning staff explained that fair-share funds must pay for capital improvements in the judicial district where collected, clarified that lapsed appropriations return to district capital funds, and acknowledged some large lapsed balances (including about $5.6M in North Kona parks); council asked for more timely reporting and departmental coordination.

Bethany Morrison of the Long Range Planning Division presented the fair-share contributions and expenditures report (as of June 30, 2025) and reviewed the rules governing those funds: fair-share revenues must fund capital improvements that add new capacity, not routine repair; projects must be located in the judicial district where funds were collected; and appropriations generally remain valid for three years before lapsing.

Morrison told council members that when appropriations lapse they generally return to the judicial-district pot for reallocation to other capital projects in that district; she noted exceptions exist when ordinances require refunds. Council members raised examples of lapsed appropriations appearing in the report—referencing projects such as a skate park, Banyans Beach Park and Pu'ulani Estates Park—and questioned whether departments are effectively using those balances. One council member noted approximately $5,600,000 had lapsed in North Kona parks, asking whether departments could be re-engaged to use those funds.

Why it matters: Fair-share funds are intended to mitigate impacts of development; if funds lapse or remain unused the county risks leaving money available for capital improvements untapped. Council members suggested improving the timing and usefulness of the annual report — potentially moving to semiannual reporting or adjusting code language — so departments and council can better match projects to these funds in the budget cycle.

Morrison said the annual report is prepared after fiscal-year reconciliation and that the planning division can work with finance and departments to flag available funds during the capital improvement budgeting process. The committee approved a motion to close the file on Communication 758 by voice vote (eight in favor, one excused).