Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Wastewater Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee forwards $1.6M/year construction management authorization for Hilo wastewater project
Summary
The Finance Committee voted to forward Resolution 461-26, which authorizes a professional construction management agreement (estimated $1.6 million per year) for phase 1 of the Hilo wastewater treatment plant upgrade, after extended questioning about scope, procurement method and not-to-exceed language.
Get email alerts on the Wastewater Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Hawaii County Finance Committee on Feb. 17 voted to forward Resolution 461-26 to the full council with a favorable recommendation after staff explained the need for external construction management services for the Hilo wastewater treatment plant rehabilitation.
Mark Grant, project coordinator for the wastewater division, told the committee the contract will provide construction management services including sequencing oversight, daily inspections and monitoring progress payments; staff estimate $1,600,000 per year for a six‑year term covering three full‑time on‑site positions: construction manager, project engineer and project inspector.
Council members requested more detailed scope-of-work language, deliverables and a not‑to‑exceed clause to control scope creep and change‑order risk. Grant and Finance Director Diane Nakagawa said that estimated amounts are derived from DAGS professional‑services rates and that the department will provide a task matrix and additional detail for the committee’s review. Staff also explained the procurement path: an expression of interest among pre‑listed professional service firms and subsequent ranking, rather than an open RFP bid process; Corporation Counsel confirmed that professional services is an accepted procurement option under state procurement law.
Councilmember Kirkowitz opposed forwarding the resolution at committee, citing concerns about long‑term costs and the need for closer legislative oversight, while five members voted in favor; the roll call was recorded as five yes, two no (the vice chair and Councilmember Kirkowitz), and two absent. The committee’s vote forwards the measure to the full County Council for consideration.
Staff said additional follow-up information will be provided on scope, estimated staffing levels and contract terms before the council vote.
