Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Short Term Rentals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee forwards vacation‑rental overhaul to planning commissions after mixed testimony
Summary
Council members voted to refer Bill 147 — a rewrite of short‑term vacation rental and bed‑and‑breakfast rules — to the planning director and Windward/Leeward planning commissions after extensive testimony from hosts, farmers, legal advocates and industry groups expressing concerns about grandfathering, enforcement, costs and the special‑permit pathway.
The committee voted to send Bill 147 — proposed changes to the countycode for hosted bed‑and‑breakfasts and short‑term vacation rentals — to the planning director and Windward/Leeward planning commissions for review and recommendation after a long public comment period that featured operators, farmers and industry groups.
Why it matters: Bill 147 would change how hosted vacation rentals and bed‑and‑breakfasts are defined and regulated in Hawaii County code. Supporters say the measure clarifies rules and improves accountability; opponents say it could force long‑standing, local operators into costly special permits or effectively eliminate some hosted operations.
Several hosted operators and agriculture stakeholders described direct economic impacts. Marie Ruhlin said a county real‑property classification change dramatically raised her property taxes and forced her to close a small hosted rental she operated since 2000. Multiple farm operators and farm‑stay hosts argued the B&B pathway and a special‑permit requirement on state agricultural land will be prohibitively expensive and could threaten farms that rely on agritourism income.
Industry representatives urged clearer grandfathering and proportionate penalties. Caitlin Miller, executive director of the Hawaii Mid and Short Term Rental Alliance, asked the committee to explicitly grandfather legally permitted B&Bs and protect operators in the 31–179 day category from being unintentionally swept into a new regulatory structure.
Council member Heather Kimball, who introduced the bill, said the measure aligns county code with state law and prior case law (the Rose Hill decision) and aims to create a defined registration and compliance pathway. Kimball told the committee that previously issued bed‑and‑breakfast permits and special‑use permits run with the land and would not be revoked; she said a grace period for compliance will be added later.
The committee did not vote the bill out of committee for adoption; instead it referred the measure to the planning director and planning commissions for review and recommendation. The referral passed with seven ayes.
Next steps: Planning staff and the Windward and Leeward planning commissions will review Bill 147 and return recommendations to the council. Council members and staff indicated they expect to define a compliance/grace period (Kimball suggested six months to a year) and to clarify registration and annual renewal provisions for existing legally permitted B&Bs.
