Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Woodland council backs further study of JPA to govern county animal services
Summary
After a county presentation on options for delivering animal-control and sheltering services, the Woodland City Council voted unanimously to direct staff to send a letter asking the county to continue evaluating a joint-powers authority (JPA) for animal services.
The Woodland City Council voted unanimously Tuesday to ask the city manager to transmit a letter to Yolo County requesting further evaluation of a joint-powers authority to govern animal services across the county.
The action followed a presentation by Alex Tengolks of the county administrator’s office, who summarized a governance analysis that compared the current contracting model with several JPA structures, hybrid approaches and nonprofit partnership options. Tengolks said per-capita costs across models were generally similar — roughly $20–$22 per resident — and that the analysis found no immediate nonprofit partner able to scale up and provide full services without time and additional capacity-building.
In making the motion, Councilmember Rich Landsberg said he wanted the city to be formally involved in a deeper review of governance, cost allocation and service levels. Mayor Pro Tem Vega seconded the motion; the council voted in favor with no opposing votes. The motion directs the city manager to send the county a letter expressing Woodland’s interest in continuing the evaluation and returning to the council with recommendations within approximately six months.
The presentation noted options the county studied, including a self-contained JPA that would run services directly, a JPA that contracts with the county for operations, and hybrid models where a nonprofit operates shelters while public agencies provide field patrol. Tengolks told the council the county’s request-for-information responses included limited capacity to immediately assume scaled services; UC Davis’ School of Veterinary Medicine offered limited clinical services such as spay/neuter.
Council discussion centered on costs, the timeline to stand up new governance structures, and whether hybrid models could reduce labor costs that drive per-capita spending. Landsberg asked staff for a supplemental analysis focused on hybrid-model per-capita costs; Tengolks acknowledged that would require further work.
Next steps: the council’s letter will not commit Woodland to a JPA but will permit deeper study of governance options, cost allocation and potential service-level tradeoffs. The county plans to present operational shelter and patrol statistics to the Board of Supervisors on March 24.
