Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the City Updates topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning Commission hears city updates on historic preservation, housing leases, cannabis workshop and bridge progress

Santa Paula Planning Commission · March 24, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff updated the commission on potential historic preservation reviews, Citrus Flats leasing and Section 8 outreach, a planned Council workshop on cannabis policy, two upcoming department job postings, and the Santa Paula Creek bridge and trail connection work.

Staff provided a series of operational updates to the Planning Commission covering several community projects and personnel matters.

Staff member (Speaker 6) said commercial property owners have expressed interest in pursuing historic-preservation designations; the city will route those requests to the design assistance committee with Planning Commission input. He reported Citrus Flats (an apartment development on the east end of town) plans to begin leasing soon and that the development team will work with social services and the housing authority to advertise available Section 8 vouchers to Santa Paula residents.

Staff also said the city is considering a special Council meeting (planned for April 6) to discuss cannabis policy and the possibility of a ballot measure for dispensaries. Two Community Development job openings will be advertised: an associate planner/economic development specialist and a community development technician to replace a long-time employee retiring in July. Staff noted the Santa Paula Creek bridge project has reached groundbreaking and emphasized future bicycle/pedestrian connectivity along the rail-trail corridor.

No formal actions or votes were taken on these items during the meeting; the remarks were informational and generated no public comment.