Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Housing ADU topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Aliso Viejo council introduces corrected ADU/JADU ordinance to align with state rules

Aliso Viejo City Council · January 21, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The council voted to introduce a corrected ADU/JADU ordinance and to find the measure exempt from CEQA under Public Resources Code 21080.17; staff said four architectural code sections were removed to comply with Housing and Community Development guidance.

The Aliso Viejo City Council voted Jan. 20 to introduce for first reading a corrected ordinance updating local rules for accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and junior ADUs (JADUs) so the city remains consistent with recent state housing law.

Senior planner Rose Rivera told the council the revised draft removes four architectural requirements that had been reintroduced in error after the ordinance’s initial introduction on Dec. 3. Rivera said the corrected changes bring the code into alignment with the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and described the items being removed or deferred to code: minimum interior width and wall height; window and door line-of-sight standards; clerestory and obscured-glazing requirements; and a 4-foot mechanical equipment setback that will instead be governed by building and fire codes.

Rivera recommended the council find the ordinance exempt from CEQA under Public Resources Code section 21080.17 and introduce it by title for first reading. Councilmembers described the item as principally a housekeeping action to keep local code consistent with state law. Councilmember Mike called it “housekeeping of housekeeping,” and Tiffany Ackley thanked staff for keeping the city in compliance.

A motion to introduce the revised ordinance passed on the council’s vote. The council did not specify an ordinance number on the record during the meeting; staff indicated the change was corrective and limited to the listed architectural provisions.

Next steps: staff will finalize the ordinance language for formal second reading and adoption at a future meeting, consistent with the city’s normal ordinance process.