Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Local Tax Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Claremont council narrowly approves polling to explore 1¢ local sales tax measure
Summary
Council voted 3–2 to authorize staff to hire FM3 for polling (not to exceed $37,750) to test voter support for a possible November 2026 local transactional sales‑tax measure; council members debated tax fatigue, timing risks from concurrent county proposals and the potential $6.7 million annual yield from a 1% increase.
Claremont — The City Council on March 10 authorized staff to engage Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin, Metz & Associates (FM3) to conduct research and polling for a potential local sales‑and‑use transactional tax, in a 3–2 roll call vote.
Staff estimated a 1% (one‑cent) local transactional tax would generate roughly $6.7 million annually for the city and become effective April 1, 2027, if voters approve it. City staff said the polling contract would not exceed $37,750 and would inform tax‑structure options, messaging and whether to pursue a ballot measure.
Council members debated the tradeoffs. Council member Kalaikai and Vice Mayor Reese opposed moving forward at this time, citing high cost of living and voter fatigue; Kalaikai questioned the accuracy and value of polling after past experience. Council member Medina said she was "on the fence" but supported obtaining community engagement data; Mayor Stark and Council member Liano voted in favor.
Staff warned of legal uncertainty created by possible county or state actions: Los Angeles County is considering a 0.5% temporary sales tax for health care and safety‑net services, and state legislation could exempt that measure from the statutory cap — a development that would affect what portion of an increase a city could actually collect. City attorney staff said the interaction of dueling measures is unsettled and might require court resolution.
Council direction authorizes polling and asks staff to return with results before mid‑June 2026 so the council can decide whether to proceed with ballot placement by the June 9 staff action deadline.
