Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Roswell council initiates package of code amendments on parking, signs, LED storefronts and trash enforcement
Summary
Staff asked the committee to authorize initiation of five text amendments to the city’s unified development code and code of ordinances to clarify front-yard parking, commercial parking-on-grass, real-estate sign definitions (including 'occupied'), LED storefront lighting, and rules on bulky items/inoperable vehicles; council approved moving all items forward for public hearings.
City planning and community development staff asked the committee to initiate five separate text amendments to the Unified Development Code and Code of Ordinances at the March 10 committee meeting, and the council unanimously approved sending the package forward for public hearings.
Michelle Alexander, Community Development Director, said the changes are intended to give staff clearer enforcement tools and remove ambiguity that has hindered municipal code enforcement and municipal-court outcomes. The initiative covers: clarifying that parking on front-yard grass is prohibited, addressing commercial parking on landscaped areas, defining when a real‑estate "for lease" sign must be removed (staff proposed language referencing "fully occupied"), adding a definition and restrictions for LED or neon window lighting, and prohibiting bulky items in city dumpsters and clarifying when a vehicle is considered inoperable for enforcement purposes.
Council members focused on the real‑estate signage language and the proposed definition of "occupied." Some members argued the city’s current interpretation — that a partially occupied building with at least one vacancy may still be allowed a temporary sign — should be explicitly preserved; others urged limits so landlords cannot indefinitely advertise imminent vacancies. Staff agreed to refine wording to clarify whether "unit" vs. "building" should be used and to consider tenancy‑notice triggers (for example, a tenant’s notice to vacate) so the provision fits practical leasing timelines.
On LED and neon window signage, staff said the city currently lacks a clear definition and therefore cannot consistently address cluttered, high‑luminosity storefront displays; councilmembers asked staff to research lumen limits and possible historic‑district exceptions. For bulky items in dumpsters, staff recommended coordination with sanitation and updated signage and outreach to businesses.
The committee approved initiation of items 3 through 9 as a package, with staff to prepare specific draft language, consult legal and stakeholders as needed, and bring the ordinances back through required planning commission hearings and later council readings.
