Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Fleet Replacement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sheriff asks county for extra $125,000 to secure used state‑contract patrol vehicles; supervisors ask for more data
Summary
The sheriff’s office presented an assessment of its patrol fleet and asked the board to consider $125,000 in additional local funding to buy three used state‑contract vehicles; supervisors pressed for detailed inventories, budget reports, a feasibility inspection by a licensed mechanic and procurement documentation before approving new spending.
At a special meeting April 10, the Claiborne County sheriff’s office outlined an urgent need to replace an aging fleet of patrol vehicles and asked the board of supervisors to consider supplemental county funding.
Miss Robinson presented a fleet assessment she said showed many vehicles with more than 100,000 miles and three vehicles completely inoperable. Robinson said five one‑year‑old vehicles available under state contract could be purchased for about $44,000 each rather than the original $56,000 sticker price; those five would be offered to counties on a first‑come basis. She said the $101,500 that had been allocated through a congressional appropriation would cover two vehicles; the sheriff asked the board to provide an additional $125,000 to buy three more vehicles to complete a planned transition away from older apparatus.
“We do have in our possession right now a fleet of five new vehicles ... they gave us a proposed quote at $44,000 each,” Robinson told the board. “So what sheriff had proposed ... is enough to secure two vehicles” with the secured funds and a $125,000 request for the remaining three.
Supervisors pressed for more detail before committing additional appropriations. Questions included a precise inventory (Robinson referenced 13 vehicles on the books with three inoperable and several over 150,000 miles), whether a licensed mechanic had performed a feasibility study (Robinson: not yet), the procurement path (state contract vs. local dealerships), and how fuel and long‑term operating costs would be affected by vehicle choice.
Board President Jones and other supervisors reiterated that department heads should receive monthly financial reports and that any budget amendment must show the originating line item, current balances and justification. Jones cited a sheriff‑department year‑end deficit of $100,578.87 from the prior year and said the board must understand previous spending patterns and revenue offsets before approving more funding.
Sheriff Goodes urged the board to restore regular work sessions so department needs can be reviewed in detail and recommended staff meet with the sheriff’s office and Miss Robinson to compile the requested documentation. The board accepted the sheriff’s report for record and agreed to seek additional reports and feasibility information before taking further funding votes.
No supplemental appropriation was made at the special meeting; supervisors asked staff and the sheriff to return with a detailed vehicle inventory, procurement quotes and budget line‑item reports for formal consideration.
