Residents urge Palm Beach County to halt Israel-bond purchases, citing legal and moral concerns
Loading...
Summary
Dozens of Palm Beach County residents urged commissioners to stop investing in Israel bonds, arguing the county's $1 billion position and rising allocation percentages violate state law, create concentration risk and fund alleged human-rights abuses; Clerk/Comptroller Mike Caruso defended the investments as lawful and higher-yielding.
Dozens of Palm Beach County residents used the commission's public-comment period to demand the county stop buying Israel bonds and to push for an ordinance banning investments in entities they described as ‘‘engaging in genocide or occupation.’’ Speakers repeatedly cited a reported $1,000,000,000 in Israel-bond holdings and a pattern of rising allocation limits — from 5 percent to 10 percent, then 15 percent and currently cited as 18 percent — that residents said exceeds prudent diversification rules.
Residents framed their objections in both legal and moral terms. Nihaya Ochana, a lifelong Palm Beach County resident, said the county's purchases ‘‘violate public investment statutes’’ and erode trust in local government. Rose, another county resident, told commissioners the investment ‘‘does not meet this standard’’ of protecting taxpayer money and urged removal of Norman Taplin from the county's Investment Policy Committee.
Several speakers cited specific state statutes as the legal basis for their objections, including references in testimony to ‘‘Florida statute 5 18.11’’ and ‘‘218.415’’ (witnesses described those provisions as imposing fiduciary duties, limiting political uses of public funds, and setting credit-rating and diversification requirements). Speakers also cited credit downgrades and risk disclosures in the Israel bond prospectus, arguing that higher yields reflect higher issuer risk.
Vance Ahrens, a former state senate candidate, pressed the commission on the ethics of continuing the purchases while citing alleged human-rights abuses abroad. Kevin, a resident who said he reviewed municipal-finance analysis, told the commission that concentrating more than 15 percent of the public portfolio in a single issuer ‘‘represents a much greater concentration of risk’’ than ordinary municipal practices.
Speakers offered a common set of demands: pass an ordinance prohibiting investments of county funds in entities alleged to commit genocide or occupation; stop any further Israel-bond purchases; and remove Norman Taplin from the Investment Policy Committee. Several residents also called on the comptroller to cease reinvestment and to redirect funds into domestic or local bonds and community projects.
The county's clerk and comptroller addressed the room after public comment. Identified earlier in the meeting as the county's clerk and comptroller, he said state law allows investment in Israel bonds and that the county follows commission-set guidelines. He told the commission the Israel-bond investments generate a higher return under the legal constraints he faces — saying the portfolio earns an estimated $37,000,000 more than available alternative investments he can legally purchase — and emphasized his constitutional duty to maximize the portfolio's rate of return.
No formal vote or action was taken during the meeting; speakers' statements and non-speaking cards were entered into the record. The public-comment block concluded with the vice mayor thanking speakers and the commission adjourning the session.
The county commission has not scheduled a public vote on an ordinance or formal policy change in this session; residents asked commissioners to consider regulatory remedies and greater oversight going forward.
