Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Design Guidelines topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Consultant outlines near-final design guidelines; commissioners debate substitute materials and affordability
Summary
A consultant presented a near-final 90+-page draft of Red Bank’s design guidelines, proposing adoption steps and public outreach; commissioners expressed support but raised concerns about the cost and feasibility of restricting substitute materials for homeowners.
The Red Bank Historic Preservation Commission received a near-final draft of town design guidelines and a proposed adoption timeline that would move a final draft to the planning board in October and to the mayor and council for adoption afterward, with public outreach planned for November.
Stephen Smolin, the consultant, told commissioners the project has three phases—research, drafting and implementation—and that he has documented the district thoroughly. “I think I’ve taken close to 8 or 900 pictures of Red Bank so far during the course of this project,” Smolin said, and he circulated excerpts and a two-page brochure summarizing storefront guidance.
Smolin highlighted a distinction in the draft between contributing and noncontributing buildings in the historic districts and described a checklist adapted from the Secretary of the Interior standards to evaluate substitute or composite materials. That checklist permits substitute materials in limited cases—typically for secondary features—while recommending in-kind repair or replacement for primary historic fabric.
Several commissioners praised the draft’s thoroughness but raised concerns about homeowner cost and feasibility if some substitute materials were discouraged. One commissioner asked whether grants or tax abatements could help offset expense; Smolin said some grant programs and municipal incentives exist in other towns and could be explored, though he did not identify an existing municipal program in Red Bank.
Smolin said the plan includes practical tools—a vendor matrix for window types, charts for appropriate roof and cladding materials and a storefront flowchart—to make administration easier. Commissioners directed staff and the consultant to refine a few points, including clearer language on when substitute materials are acceptable and guidance on darker window frames; Smolin said he would incorporate feedback for the September draft.
