Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Supply topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission urges hydraulic modeling, pressure limits for new subdivisions
Summary
Monroe Planning Commission recommended the City require developer-paid hydraulic modeling for subdivisions of three or more lots, consider increasing ERC allotments for non-irrigated homes, and halt new subdivisions in the 'red zone' until infrastructure improvements are made; the Council asked for ordinance language and agreed to place the items on a future agenda.
The Monroe Planning Commission asked the City Council on March 24 to adopt ordinances to address chronic water-pressure concerns in the city’s red zone.
Chair Candice Barney told the council the commission learned during a land-use training that it can approve conditional use permits under state code without sending every permit to the council, but the commission also flagged growing pressure problems tied to new subdivisions without irrigation systems. With input from Parker Vercimak of Jones & DeMille Engineering, the commission proposed three steps: require developers of subdivisions of three or more lots to pay for an updated hydraulic model (estimated at about $1,500), consider increasing the equivalent residential connection (ERC) allotment for homes without irrigation in the next water study, and restrict approvals for new subdivisions in the red zone until infrastructure improvements are completed.
Barney said the commission approved a conditional use permit for Studio 17, Ashlyn Thalman’s dance studio, located at roughly 409 E Monroe Canyon Road pending purchase of the site; the commission plans to have the applicant sign paperwork acknowledging the site’s pressure limitations. Parker Vercimak raised concerns about cumulative culinary-water demand when irrigation is not provided with new lots and recommended waiting to allow infrastructure upgrades.
Mayor Johnny Parsons indicated he supported moving forward and instructed staff and the commission to prepare clear ordinance language using mandatory terms (for example, "shall" rather than "may") for consistent enforcement. The council did not adopt an ordinance at the March 24 meeting; members agreed to place the commission’s recommendations on a future agenda for formal consideration.
Why this matters: the measures would shift the cost of technical review to developers, tighten controls on where subdivisions may be approved and could affect housing developers’ timelines and costs. The Planning Commission’s proposals aim to protect existing customers from pressure loss while giving the city data to inform its next water study.
