Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Charter Schools topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Community speakers back Excel Academy petition at Irvine USD public hearing
Summary
Excel Academy presented a Prop 39/charter petition to the Irvine board and dozens of parents, students and staff testified in support, citing flexible schedules, improved test scores and services for students with special education needs; the public hearing closed and the board will decide later.
Get email alerts on the Charter Schools topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Excel Academy Charter Schools presented its petition and program to the Irvine Unified School District board during a statutorily required public hearing, and dozens of parents, students and staff told trustees the charter model provides an essential alternative for families with students who need flexible schedules or individualized supports.
Heidi Gaska, identified as superintendent/CEO for Excel Academy, outlined the school's mission and program model, saying Excel seeks to "invest in each student by providing a personalized and engaging experience centered on a collaborative partnership between the school and the home." Her presentation included academic outcomes (CAASPP and local assessment gains), descriptions of the virtual pathway and a specialized special education program serving students with diverse needs.
More than 20 public commenters spoke during the hearing. Parents and students described improvements in I-Ready and CAASPP scores, smaller class sizes, increased safety and individualized IEP support. "Being able to take breaks when I need and change my school environment has allowed me to learn the way that works best for me," said sixth-grader Lola Walker, who testified about her experience at Excel Academy. Parents and teachers said Excel allows students to pursue arts, athletics, or intensive training while maintaining academic progress.
District staff explained that under the Charter Schools Act of 1992 the board must hold the hearing within 60 days of petition receipt and that the board will later decide whether to grant or deny the petition. The public hearing was closed after testimony; trustees thanked presenters and public speakers and asked staff to continue follow-up and dialogue with petitioners.
No vote on the petition was taken that night; the board deferred a final decision to a later meeting, as required by the evaluation process and the board's timeline for reviewing charter petitions.
