Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Redevelopment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sayreville planners back study to designate Main Street–Crossman area "in need of redevelopment"
Summary
The Sayreville Planning Board voted Dec. 3 to recommend that a 16‑parcel area at the Main Street and Crossman Street intersection be designated an "area in need of redevelopment," citing underused parcels, parking and circulation issues, and proximity to recent roadway improvements.
The Sayreville Planning Board voted Dec. 3 to recommend that the borough council consider designating a 16‑parcel area around the Main Street and North Crossman Street intersection as an "area in need of redevelopment." Planner Veena Sawant told the board the study area—about 2.4 acres—contains underutilized parcels, a strip mall with recurring vacancies, and site circulation and parking constraints that make redevelopment appropriate under the borough’s master plan.
"This is a non‑condemnation plan," Sawant said, explaining property owners would not be forced to sell and could continue existing uses if they choose. She said two parcels with clean operations—a food‑packaging facility (Sabert Corporation) and a multi‑tenant office/lab—should be excluded from the designation.
Sawant described existing infrastructure improvements near the intersection, including planned sidewalks and roadway work, and noted the study focuses on allowing property owners and developers to pursue redevelopment opportunities that could improve access and attract compatible businesses. She also addressed concerns about employee access and deliveries raised by Lionel Pena, who identified himself as representing Sabert Corporation and said his company employs about 150 people who use nearby stores and rely on Crossman Road access.
Board members asked about notice to property owners and the mechanics of off‑site improvements. Sawant said the planning process typically requires developers to include traffic and circulation improvements and that the borough would coordinate notice and outreach. After discussion the board moved to recommend the designation to the borough governing body; the vote was recorded in favor by roll call.
The recommendation is a procedural step: if the council approves the designation, the borough would begin formal redevelopment planning and the board said it would provide a follow‑up for implementation and specific project reviews.
