Citizen Portal
Sign In

Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows

Commissioners approve 90-day camera retention and ask for facial-recognition quotes as courthouse security plan advances

Randolph County Board of Commissioners · April 14, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Following staff presentations, commissioners authorized extending camera retention to 90 days, discussed adding cameras to secure courthouse doors and requested vendor quotes — including facial-recognition costs — and directed staff to coordinate policy on egress and employee access.

County IT and building staff updated commissioners on plans to strengthen courthouse security, increase camera coverage and extend video retention, and the board approved immediate changes while seeking additional cost and policy details.

Joseph Baldridge, the county IT representative, told the board the current storage kept footage for just under 30 days and recommended adding an expansion unit to extend retention; commissioners voted to extend retention to 90 days and approved a $2,119.86 extension for backup services. Building and security staff outlined a $22,649 proposal to install two doors with power openers at the courthouse north entry and discussed making east and west doors emergency-egress only while routing daily public traffic through a single secured entrance. The chair said a security company will attend the next commissioners meeting and that if courthouse locking proceeds, the county needs a written employee policy for egress and corrective action.

Commissioner Missy Williams asked whether facial recognition was being considered and staff said that facial-recognition capability would require replacing or upgrading cameras and licenses; staff will obtain quotes and clarify whether facial recognition is included in the current camera vendor quotes. The board also asked staff to produce a list of individuals who should have camera access and to tighten department-head codes to limit broad employee access.

Why it matters: Extending retention and tightening camera access affect privacy and law-enforcement evidence handling; facial-recognition adds legal and policy questions the county must weigh before adoption.

Next steps: Staff will obtain quotes for camera hardware, server capacity and facial-recognition options, prepare a formal list of authorized users, and present a recommended employee/visitor access policy at the next meeting.