Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows
House advances bill to allow attorney general audits of Memphis district attorney's office
Loading...
Summary
The House passed House Bill 43 on third reading after a lengthy floor debate. Sponsor Chairman Farmer said the bill creates an audit mechanism for the 30th Judicial District (Memphis) to ensure prosecutions are pursued; opponents said it undermines elected DAs and risks constitutional conflict.
House members passed House Bill 43 on third and final reading after extended floor debate over whether the measure would preserve public safety or undermine the independence of locally elected prosecutors.
Sponsor Chairman Farmer said the bill creates an audit process focused on the 30th Judicial District that would track case handling and give the attorney general authority to petition the Tennessee Supreme Court to appoint a district attorney pro tempore to prosecute particular cases "if there's a situation where a crime's not being prosecuted." "So the whole intent and point of this bill is to be sure that Memphis continues on the right track," Farmer said on the floor, framing the measure as a public-safety and victims'-rights bill.
Opponents argued the bill overrides the constitutional independence of district attorneys and singled out Memphis. Representative Clemons said the state Supreme Court already has authority under Article 6, Section 5 to appoint a pro tem in cases where a district attorney fails to prosecute, and warned against transferring that function to the attorney general. "The constitution of the state of Tennessee... already provides for the Supreme Court to do exactly what this bill seeks to allow our...attorney general to do," Clemons said.
Other critics said the bill threatens local control and could politicize prosecutorial decisions. Representative Pearson said: "The constant barrage of legislation and attacks on our district attorney isn't making our community safer." Representative Miller described the measure as a personal attack on the elected DA in Shelby County and urged colleagues to reject it, calling it "the vendetta bill" during his remarks.
Proponents cited criminal-justice data and prosecution outcomes in Memphis to justify scrutiny. Leader Lambert cited statistics for a single month in the district, saying, "In 1 particular district, there were 514 felony cases resolved in December 2025... 144 of those cases were dismissed" and arguing the bill would provide transparency.
The House completed third-reading procedures and the presiding officer declared House Bill 43 passed; an objection was lodged regarding placement of votes on the executive table. The measure, as discussed on the floor, applies only to the 30th Judicial District. The transcript does not specify next procedural steps on sending the bill or any conference committee actions beyond the floor vote.
