Candidates debate special assessments and housing strategy as potential industry growth looms

Candidates at the Minot Chamber forum discussed approaches to increase housing starts and whether special assessments should be used to finance neighborhood improvements.

Isaiah Keller said he does not support special assessments, calling them an unfair burden on some homeowners. David Wiley strongly opposed assessments, saying they are unfair to homeowners who may face large unexpected bills. John McMartin and Steve Padragola said special assessments can be appropriate in specific cases—such as major sewer or drainage work that benefits a defined area—but should be evaluated case by case and shared when benefits are citywide.

Several candidates argued for encouraging infill development and using funds like the city’s magic fund strategically to support housing infrastructure rather than expanding services to costly greenfield development on the city fringe. Nicole Brasfield and Joan Hawbaker both urged building closer to existing infrastructure to lower costs for both the city and future homeowners.

The topic gained urgency during discussion because candidates referenced possible industrial projects that could increase demand for housing. John McMartin cited a planned North American Steel project that he said could bring several hundred jobs and increase the need for housing starts.

No formal proposal was made; candidates’ positions provide voters with distinct choices on who would support homeowner‑assessed infrastructure versus broader city funding for growth.