Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sheriff’s office presses council over late bills and home‑rule funds; council approves partial payments and will advertise pay‑matrix change
Summary
Sheriff’s office representatives told the council home‑rule and discretionary funds were expected to cover equipment and training; after heated debate the council approved $10,000 for software and $20,000 for safety supplies, and directed staff to advertise a proposal extending the pay matrix from 20 to 30 years for deputies.
Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A lengthy exchange at the April 14 Scott County Council meeting centered on unpaid sheriff’s office bills, the role of ‘‘home‑rule’’ (discretionary) funds and the county’s salary matrix for long‑serving deputies.
A sheriff’s office representative told the council the department had used discretionary funds in past years to buy equipment and cover expenses, and that those funds were not carried forward or appropriated as expected. The representative said that practice saved taxpayer dollars but left the office short when lines were not appropriated. ‘‘When we didn't have [the home‑rule funds] ... we had to go into our budget, which is taxpayer lines, which ... makes those lines short,’’ the office representative said.
Council members pressed for details about outstanding invoices and whether funds had been requested and denied during the budget process. The sheriff’s office requested $42,006.74 from the law‑enforcement training account for software and office supplies and asked for $20,000 from the lease fund for safety supplies. The council first held a roll call vote on the full $42,006.74 request; the motion failed 4–3. Council members then moved smaller approvals: a $10,000 transfer for software from the law‑enforcement training fund passed on a motion and second, and a $20,000 transfer from the lease fund for safety supplies also passed (each vote recorded as 7–0 when taken).
Separately, council members and sheriff’s office representatives debated longevity pay for personnel with 20 or more years of service. The sheriff’s side asked for a restoration or an alternative longevity arrangement; the council agreed to advertise a proposed change to the salary ordinance that would extend the pay matrix from 20 to 30 years and to revisit the proposal at the May meeting for formal consideration.
The council’s partial approvals are intended to clear the most urgent outstanding bills while staff work to reconcile line items and present a fuller budget solution in follow‑up sessions.

