Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Transparency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public commenter urges halt to remodeling, questions museum and procurement practices
Summary
During public comment at the June 24 White Pine County Tourism Board meeting, resident George Chachas pressed the board to stop remodeling of a county facility, questioned an unusual billing label on a bill and urged denial or further scrutiny of several grant applications and the Nevada Northern Railway until it complies with open-meeting rules.
During the public-comment period at the June 24 meeting, George Chachas raised multiple concerns about transparency and procurement. He said board records showed bill no. 12519 appearing as a payment to O'Flaherty Plumbing labeled for a "bike magazine" and asked the board to review that charge and other bills. The board's director later told the board that the "bike magazine" entry was a mislabeling.
Chachas urged the board to terminate the remodeling of a county facility (agenda item 4c5) and to deny a range of Renaissance-related applications (identified in the agenda as 4c7d and 4c8e). He also urged denial of agenda items tied to the Nevada Northern Railway (4c7e and 4c8g) until the railway "comes under the Nevada open meeting law," asserting it does not currently operate under those rules.
Chachas questioned whether Randy Henefer is the contractor for work on a rail car at the White Pine Public Museum and criticized the museum’s current presentation, saying it leaves a poor first impression of Ely. He also raised several transparency items: absence of a rental agreement with Ian Bullis or the Food Bank, lack of monthly income figures for the convention center since Kyle Horvath was hired, missing pre-Horvath inventory lists, and concerns that the convention center parking lot is not ADA compliant.
Director Kyle Horvath responded to the billing question, saying the labeling was incorrect and that the charge was for plumbing work. The board did not take formal action on the public commenter’s requests during the meeting as recorded in the transcript excerpts provided.
The public comments were noted on the record; the board later proceeded with grant awards and budget actions.
